2002 Citroen C 15 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Citroen C 15 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1966 Triumph 2000 (91 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 34 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1966 Triumph 2000 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1966 Triumph 2000 weights approximately 225 kg more than 2002 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1966 Triumph 2000 (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 45 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1966 Triumph 2000 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C 15 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | C 15 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |