2002 Citroen C 15 vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 2002 Citroen C 15 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C 15 weights approximately 5 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 20 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1967 Mazda Cosmo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Citroen C 15 | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | C 15 | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 57 L |
