2002 Citroen C 15 vs. 1968 MG MGC
To start off, 2002 Citroen C 15 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 MG MGC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 MG MGC would be higher. At 2,911 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 MG MGC is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 MG MGC (148 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 MG MGC should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Because 1968 MG MGC is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 MG MGC. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 MG MGC (174 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 1968 MG MGC will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Citroen C 15 | 1968 MG MGC | |
| Make | Citroen | MG |
| Model | C 15 | MGC |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1747 cc | 2911 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 148 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 174 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1530 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2560 mm |
