2002 Citroen C 15 vs. 2004 Holden Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Holden Rodeo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,405 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Holden Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Holden Rodeo (93 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Holden Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Because 2004 Holden Rodeo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2004 Holden Rodeo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Holden Rodeo (207 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2004 Holden Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C 15 | 2004 Holden Rodeo | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C 15 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 2405 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 93 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 207 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4910 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 3060 mm |