2002 Citroen C 15 vs. 2009 Holden Epica
To start off, 2009 Holden Epica is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 91 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm). This means 2009 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C 15 | 2009 Holden Epica | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C 15 | Epica |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 113 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |