2002 Citroen C 15 vs. 2009 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2009 Jeep Commander is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 2,987 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Jeep Commander is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Commander (215 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 158 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP @ 4600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Jeep Commander weights approximately 1410 kg more than 2002 Citroen C 15. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Jeep Commander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Citroen C 15. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Commander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Jeep Commander (510 Nm @ 1600 RPM) has 397 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Jeep Commander will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C 15 | 2009 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Citroen | Jeep |
Model | C 15 | Commander |
Year Released | 2002 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1747 cc | 2987 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 57 HP | 215 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 113 Nm | 510 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 80 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 23.0:1 | 17.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 2355 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4010 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2790 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 80 L |