2002 Citroen C 15 vs. 2011 Holden Calais
To start off, 2011 Holden Calais is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C 15. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C 15 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Holden Calais is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Calais (344 HP) has 287 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C 15. (57 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Calais should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Because 2011 Holden Calais is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Calais. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C 15, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Holden Calais (530 Nm) has 417 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C 15. (113 Nm). This means 2011 Holden Calais will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C 15.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Citroen C 15 | 2011 Holden Calais | |
| Make | Citroen | Holden |
| Model | C 15 | Calais |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1747 cc | 6000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Horse Power | 57 HP | 344 HP |
| Torque | 113 Nm | 530 Nm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
