2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1959 DKW Munga
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 DKW Munga would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 65 more horse power than 1959 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1959 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 DKW Munga weights approximately 165 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3.
Because 1959 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Citroen C3. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1959 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Citroen C3 (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 31 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 DKW Munga. (79 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 DKW Munga.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1959 DKW Munga | |
Make | Citroen | DKW |
Model | C3 | Munga |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 79 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2010 mm |