2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1967 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 3,442 cc (6 cylinders), 1967 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Jaguar 240 (208 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 100 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Jaguar 240 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1967 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 382 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1967 Jaguar 240 (300 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1967 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1967 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Citroen | Jaguar |
Model | C3 | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3442 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 208 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 300 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.1:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1138 kg | 1520 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4540 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 54 L |