2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1968 Holden Brougham
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Holden Brougham. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Holden Brougham would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Holden Brougham is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Holden Brougham (182 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 95 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Holden Brougham should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3.
Because 1968 Holden Brougham is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Holden Brougham. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Holden Brougham (407 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 207 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (200 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1968 Holden Brougham will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1968 Holden Brougham | |
Make | Citroen | Holden |
Model | C3 | Brougham |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1398 cc | 5025 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 182 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4600 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 407 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4890 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2830 mm |