2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1969 Holden Monaro

To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1969 Holden Monaro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1969 Holden Monaro would be higher. At 5,025 cc (8 cylinders), 1969 Holden Monaro is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1969 Holden Monaro (208 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 119 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1969 Holden Monaro should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1969 Holden Monaro weights approximately 116 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1969 Holden Monaro is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1969 Holden Monaro. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1969 Holden Monaro (411 Nm @ 2400 RPM) has 296 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (115 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1969 Holden Monaro will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications: