2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 would be higher. At 2,778 cc (6 cylinders), 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (180 HP) has 113 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (67 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3.
Because 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 (258 Nm) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (147 Nm). This means 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1970 Mercedes-Benz 280 | |
Make | Citroen | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | C3 | 280 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 180 HP |
Torque | 147 Nm | 258 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 86.6 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 78.7 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.5:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4290 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1330 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2410 mm |