2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1980 Mazda 929
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 22 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 Mazda 929. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 Mazda 929 would be higher. At 1,970 cc (4 cylinders), 1980 Mazda 929 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1980 Mazda 929 (89 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 22 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1980 Mazda 929 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1980 Mazda 929 weights approximately 55 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1980 Mazda 929 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1980 Mazda 929. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1980 Mazda 929 (160 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1980 Mazda 929 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1980 Mazda 929 | |
Make | Citroen | Mazda |
Model | C3 | 929 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 1970 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 89 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 160 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 98 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 8.6:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1097 kg | 1152 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1720 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2620 mm |