2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1987 Volvo 240

To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Volvo 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Volvo 240 would be higher. At 1,986 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Volvo 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Volvo 240 (96 HP) has 24 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (72 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Volvo 240 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Volvo 240 weights approximately 210 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1987 Volvo 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Volvo 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Volvo 240 (157 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 39 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 1987 Volvo 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications: