2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1987 Volvo 760
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1987 Volvo 760. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1987 Volvo 760 would be higher. At 2,316 cc (4 cylinders), 1987 Volvo 760 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1987 Volvo 760 (180 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 113 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1987 Volvo 760 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1987 Volvo 760 weights approximately 253 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1987 Volvo 760 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1987 Volvo 760. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1987 Volvo 760 (258 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 111 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 1987 Volvo 760 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1987 Volvo 760 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | 760 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1987 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2316 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 180 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5700 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 258 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 73.7 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1097 kg | 1350 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1440 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2780 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 82 L |