2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1994 Ford Tempo
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1994 Ford Tempo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1994 Ford Tempo would be higher. At 2,307 cc (4 cylinders), 1994 Ford Tempo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen C3 (108 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 12 more horse power than 1994 Ford Tempo. (96 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1994 Ford Tempo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1994 Ford Tempo weights approximately 225 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1994 Ford Tempo (171 Nm @ 2600 RPM) has 61 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (110 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1994 Ford Tempo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1994 Ford Tempo | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C3 | Tempo |
Year Released | 2002 | 1994 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 2307 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5750 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Torque | 110 Nm | 171 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2600 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 93.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 945 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4480 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2540 mm |