2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1998 Mercury Villager
To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1998 Mercury Villager. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1998 Mercury Villager would be higher. At 2,960 cc (6 cylinders), 1998 Mercury Villager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1998 Mercury Villager (149 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 90 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (59 HP @ 6000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1998 Mercury Villager should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1998 Mercury Villager weights approximately 744 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 1998 Mercury Villager | |
Make | Citroen | Mercury |
Model | C3 | Villager |
Year Released | 2002 | 1998 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Minivan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 2960 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 59 HP | 149 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1056 kg | 1800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4950 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2860 mm |