2002 Citroen C3 vs. 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv

To start off, 2002 Citroen C3 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv would be higher. At 2,616 cc, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (276 HP @ 9000 RPM) has 187 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (89 HP @ 5250 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C3 weights approximately 29 kg more than 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv.

Because 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv (214 Nm @ 8000 RPM) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (115 Nm @ 3250 RPM). This means 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Citroen C3 1999 Mazda RX-Evolv
Make Citroen Mazda
Model C3 RX-Evolv
Year Released 2002 1999
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1360 cc 2616 cc
Engine Type in-line dual-disk rotary
Horse Power 89 HP 276 HP
Engine RPM 5250 RPM 9000 RPM
Torque 115 Nm 214 Nm
Torque RPM 3250 RPM 8000 RPM
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Automatic Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Weight 1279 kg 1250 kg
Vehicle Length 3860 mm 4290 mm
Vehicle Width 1670 mm 1770 mm
Vehicle Height 1540 mm 1360 mm