2002 Citroen C3 vs. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo
To start off, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Isuzu Rodeo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (250 HP) has 190 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (60 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Isuzu Rodeo weights approximately 737 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Isuzu Rodeo (334 Nm) has 224 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (110 Nm). This means 2004 Isuzu Rodeo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 2004 Isuzu Rodeo | |
Make | Citroen | Isuzu |
Model | C3 | Rodeo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1124 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 60 HP | 250 HP |
Torque | 110 Nm | 334 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 72 mm | 93 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 69 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 10.3:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1053 kg | 1790 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1790 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1770 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.2 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 74 L |