2002 Citroen C3 vs. 2011 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2011 Toyota Matrix is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,400 cc (4 cylinders), 2011 Toyota Matrix is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Toyota Matrix (158 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 91 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (67 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Toyota Matrix should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Toyota Matrix (219 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (147 Nm @ 1750 RPM). This means 2011 Toyota Matrix will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 2011 Toyota Matrix | |
Make | Citroen | Toyota |
Model | C3 | Matrix |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1360 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 67 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 147 Nm | 219 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1765 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1549 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2601 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 50 L |