2002 Citroen C3 vs. 2011 Volvo C30
To start off, 2011 Volvo C30 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C3 would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2011 Volvo C30 weights approximately 371 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Volvo C30 (350 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (120 Nm). This means 2011 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C3 | 2011 Volvo C30 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | C30 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 120 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1080 kg | 1451 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3860 mm | 4252 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1670 mm | 1783 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1540 mm | 1448 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2470 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 60 L |