2002 Citroen C5 vs. 1966 Triumph 2000
To start off, 2002 Citroen C5 is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1966 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1966 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (6 cylinders), 1966 Triumph 2000 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen C5 (138 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1966 Triumph 2000. (91 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C5 should accelerate faster than 1966 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C5 weights approximately 230 kg more than 1966 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Citroen C5 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 32 more torque (in Nm) than 1966 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Citroen C5 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1966 Triumph 2000.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C5 | 1966 Triumph 2000 | |
Make | Citroen | Triumph |
Model | C5 | 2000 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1966 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 138 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5250 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 190 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85.1 mm | 74.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 76 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1400 kg | 1170 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4770 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1780 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1530 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2700 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 64 L |