2002 Citroen C8 vs. 1967 Volvo 120
To start off, 2002 Citroen C8 is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Volvo 120. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Volvo 120 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Citroen C8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen C8 (135 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1967 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C8 should accelerate faster than 1967 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C8 weights approximately 673 kg more than 1967 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1967 Volvo 120 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1967 Volvo 120. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Citroen C8 (190 Nm @ 4100 RPM) has 46 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Volvo 120. (144 Nm @ 2300 RPM). This means 2002 Citroen C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Volvo 120.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C8 | 1967 Volvo 120 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C8 | 120 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1967 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1778 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 135 HP | 67 HP |
Torque | 190 Nm | 144 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4100 RPM | 2300 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 84.2 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 11.0:1 | 8.7:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1687 kg | 1014 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4460 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1510 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 47 L | 45 L |