2002 Citroen C8 vs. 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 2002 Citroen C8 is newer by 21 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass (123 HP @ 4900 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C8. (108 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen C8 weights approximately 465 kg more than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Citroen C8 (270 Nm @ 1750 RPM) has 67 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass. (203 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Citroen C8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen C8 | 1981 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
Make | Citroen | Oldsmobile |
Model | C8 | Cutlass |
Year Released | 2002 | 1981 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 123 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 4900 RPM |
Torque | 270 Nm | 203 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1750 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 1785 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4730 mm | 4850 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1860 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2830 mm | 2680 mm |