2002 Citroen C8 vs. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER

To start off, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C8 would be higher. At 3,600 cc (6 cylinders), 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (301 HP @ 6350 RPM) has 174 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C8. (127 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER weights approximately 12 kg more than 2002 Citroen C8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen C8, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER (363 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 49 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C8. (314 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C8. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER has automatic transmission and 2002 Citroen C8 has manual transmission. 2002 Citroen C8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Citroen C8 2013 Dodge CHALLENGER
Make Citroen Dodge
Model C8 CHALLENGER
Year Released 2002 2013
Body Type Minivan Coupe
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2175 cc 3600 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 127 HP 301 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6350 RPM
Torque 314 Nm 363 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 4800 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 96 mm 83 mm
Fuel Type Diesel Flex Fuel
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual 5-speed automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 1723 kg 1735 kg
Vehicle Length 4730 mm 5023 mm
Vehicle Width 1860 mm 1923 mm
Vehicle Height 1760 mm 1449 mm
Wheelbase Size 2830 mm 2946 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 66 L 72 L