2002 Citroen Saxo vs. 1959 Ford Prefect
To start off, 2002 Citroen Saxo is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Ford Prefect. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Ford Prefect would be higher. At 996 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Ford Prefect is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Citroen Saxo (49 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1959 Ford Prefect. (38 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Citroen Saxo should accelerate faster than 1959 Ford Prefect. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen Saxo weights approximately 5 kg more than 1959 Ford Prefect. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Ford Prefect is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Ford Prefect. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Citroen Saxo, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Citroen Saxo (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Ford Prefect. (72 Nm @ 2700 RPM). This means 2002 Citroen Saxo will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Ford Prefect.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen Saxo | 1959 Ford Prefect | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Saxo | Prefect |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 953 cc | 996 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 72 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 2700 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 8.9:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 800 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3810 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2220 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 54 L |