2002 Citroen Saxo vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2002 Citroen Saxo is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1983 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 49 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Citroen Saxo weights approximately 35 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102.
Let's talk about torque, 1983 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 21 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1983 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen Saxo | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | Saxo | 102 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
Engine Size | 953 cc | 1299 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 49 HP | 49 HP |
Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 74 Nm | 95 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 770 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1630 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2390 mm | 2160 mm |