2002 Citroen Xsara vs. 2006 Pontiac SV 6
To start off, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 3,491 cc (6 cylinders), 2006 Pontiac SV 6 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 (196 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 2002 Citroen Xsara. (89 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen Xsara.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Pontiac SV 6 (289 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 154 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen Xsara. (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Pontiac SV 6 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Citroen Xsara | 2006 Pontiac SV 6 | |
Make | Citroen | Pontiac |
Model | Xsara | SV 6 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1585 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 196 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Torque | 135 Nm | 289 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 94 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 84 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 5230 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1840 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 3080 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 6.5 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 66 L | 95 L |