2002 Dacia Supernova vs. 1968 Ford Fairlane
To start off, 2002 Dacia Supernova is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Fairlane. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Fairlane would be higher. At 2,782 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Ford Fairlane is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Fairlane (81 HP) has 7 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Fairlane should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Fairlane weights approximately 360 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Fairlane is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Fairlane. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dacia Supernova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dacia Supernova | 1968 Ford Fairlane | |
Make | Dacia | Ford |
Model | Supernova | Fairlane |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 2782 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 81 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1310 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 5110 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1390 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 40 L |