2002 Dacia Supernova vs. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V
To start off, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dacia Supernova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dacia Supernova would be higher. At 6,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V (556 HP) has 482 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Cadillac CTS-V should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Cadillac CTS-V weights approximately 965 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Cadillac CTS-V is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2012 Cadillac CTS-V. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dacia Supernova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dacia Supernova | 2012 Cadillac CTS-V | |
Make | Dacia | Cadillac |
Model | Supernova | CTS-V |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 6200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 556 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1915 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4788 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1882 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1422 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 68 L |