2002 Dacia Supernova vs. 2012 Nissan Cube
To start off, 2012 Nissan Cube is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dacia Supernova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dacia Supernova would be higher. At 1,800 cc (4 cylinders), 2012 Nissan Cube is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Cube (122 HP) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Cube should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Cube weights approximately 318 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dacia Supernova | 2012 Nissan Cube | |
Make | Dacia | Nissan |
Model | Supernova | Cube |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1800 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 122 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | CVT |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1268 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3980 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1694 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1651 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 7.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 9.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 50 L |