2002 Dacia Supernova vs. 2012 Renault Clio
To start off, 2012 Renault Clio is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dacia Supernova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dacia Supernova would be higher. At 1,396 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Dacia Supernova is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Renault Clio (97 HP) has 23 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Renault Clio weights approximately 690 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Dacia Supernova | 2012 Renault Clio | |
Make | Dacia | Renault |
Model | Supernova | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2012 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1390 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 74 HP | 97 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 183 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1640 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 3990 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1710 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 5.7 L/100km | 6.6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 55 L |