2002 Dacia Supernova vs. 2013 BMW M3
To start off, 2013 BMW M3 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dacia Supernova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dacia Supernova would be higher. At 3,999 cc (8 cylinders), 2013 BMW M3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 BMW M3 (408 HP) has 334 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 BMW M3 should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 BMW M3 weights approximately 930 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2013 BMW M3 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 BMW M3. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Dacia Supernova, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dacia Supernova | 2013 BMW M3 | |
| Make | Dacia | BMW |
| Model | Supernova | M3 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 3999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 408 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Top Speed | 168 km/hour | 250 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1880 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4618 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1976 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1392 mm |
| Fuel Consumption | 5.3 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 63 L |
