2002 Dacia Supernova vs. 2013 Kia RIO
To start off, 2013 Kia RIO is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Dacia Supernova. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Dacia Supernova would be higher. At 1,600 cc (4 cylinders), 2013 Kia RIO is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Kia RIO (136 HP) has 62 more horse power than 2002 Dacia Supernova. (74 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Kia RIO should accelerate faster than 2002 Dacia Supernova. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Kia RIO weights approximately 265 kg more than 2002 Dacia Supernova. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2013 Kia RIO has automatic transmission and 2002 Dacia Supernova has manual transmission. 2002 Dacia Supernova will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Kia RIO will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Dacia Supernova | 2013 Kia RIO | |
| Make | Dacia | Kia |
| Model | Supernova | RIO |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1396 cc | 1600 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 74 HP | 136 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 6-speed automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 950 kg | 1215 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4040 mm | 4366 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1650 mm | 1720 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1455 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 5.3 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 6.7 L/100km | 6.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 44 L | 43 L |
