2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1950 Saab 92
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1950 Saab 92. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1950 Saab 92 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1950 Saab 92. (24 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1950 Saab 92. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 630 kg more than 1950 Saab 92. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 1950 Saab 92 | |
Make | Daewoo | Saab |
Model | Evanda | 92 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1950 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 764 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 24 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 805 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3960 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |