2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1964 Wartburg 311
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Wartburg 311. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Wartburg 311 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP) has 82 more horse power than 1964 Wartburg 311. (49 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1964 Wartburg 311. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 465 kg more than 1964 Wartburg 311. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 83 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Wartburg 311. (98 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Wartburg 311.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 1964 Wartburg 311 | |
Make | Daewoo | Wartburg |
Model | Evanda | 311 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 992 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 49 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 98 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 78 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 7.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 970 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4310 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1360 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2460 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 43 L |