2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1968 Jaguar 240
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar 240. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar 240 would be higher. At 2,483 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Jaguar 240 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 131 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Jaguar 240 weights approximately 18 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Because 1968 Jaguar 240 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Jaguar 240. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1968 Jaguar 240 (204 Nm @ 3700 RPM) has 22 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (182 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1968 Jaguar 240 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 1968 Jaguar 240 | |
Make | Daewoo | Jaguar |
Model | Evanda | 240 |
Year Released | 2002 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2483 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 131 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 204 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3700 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 83 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.5 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1440 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4600 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2740 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 12.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 54 L |