2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1976 Nissan 240 C
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Nissan 240 C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Nissan 240 C would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 175 kg more than 1976 Nissan 240 C.
Because 1976 Nissan 240 C is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Nissan 240 C. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2002 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 1976 Nissan 240 C has manual transmission. 1976 Nissan 240 C will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 1976 Nissan 240 C | |
Make | Daewoo | Nissan |
Model | Evanda | 240 C |
Year Released | 2002 | 1976 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1982 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 1260 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2700 mm |