2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1977 Fiat 133
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 25 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1977 Fiat 133. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1977 Fiat 133 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1977 Fiat 133. (34 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1977 Fiat 133. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 745 kg more than 1977 Fiat 133. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1977 Fiat 133 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1977 Fiat 133. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 126 more torque (in Nm) than 1977 Fiat 133. (55 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1977 Fiat 133.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daewoo Evanda | 1977 Fiat 133 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Fiat |
| Model | Evanda | 133 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1977 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 843 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 34 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 55 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 65 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 68 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 7.9:1 |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 690 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1430 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1330 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2030 mm |
