2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 1983 Zastava 102
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Evanda is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1983 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1983 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 82 more horse power than 1983 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 1983 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 665 kg more than 1983 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1983 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1983 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daewoo Evanda | 1983 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Zastava |
| Model | Evanda | 102 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 1983 |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 181 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2160 mm |
