2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2003 Renault Clio
To start off, 2003 Renault Clio is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 58 more horse power than 2003 Renault Clio. (73 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda should accelerate faster than 2003 Renault Clio. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 455 kg more than 2003 Renault Clio. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 76 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Renault Clio. (105 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Renault Clio. 2002 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 2003 Renault Clio has manual transmission. 2003 Renault Clio will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 2003 Renault Clio | |
Make | Daewoo | Renault |
Model | Evanda | Clio |
Year Released | 2002 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1149 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 73 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 105 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 69 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 76.8 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.8:1 |
Top Speed | 188 km/hour | 170 km/hour |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.8 seconds | 13 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 980 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 3820 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1650 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1420 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2480 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.5 L/100km | 4.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.6 L/100km | 7.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 6 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 50 L |