2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2004 GMC Savana
To start off, 2004 GMC Savana is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 5,359 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 GMC Savana is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 GMC Savana (285 HP) has 154 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 GMC Savana should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 GMC Savana weights approximately 1102 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 GMC Savana (441 Nm) has 260 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm). This means 2004 GMC Savana will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 2004 GMC Savana | |
Make | Daewoo | GMC |
Model | Evanda | Savana |
Year Released | 2002 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 5359 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 285 HP |
Torque | 181 Nm | 441 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 96 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.6:1 | 9.5:1 |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 2537 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 5700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 2080 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 3440 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.5 L/100km | 13.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.6 L/100km | 16.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 9.8 L/100km | 14.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 117 L |