2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2005 Peugeot 607
To start off, 2005 Peugeot 607 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 2,946 cc (6 cylinders), 2005 Peugeot 607 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Peugeot 607 (204 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Peugeot 607 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Peugeot 607 weights approximately 213 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2005 Peugeot 607 (285 Nm @ 3750 RPM) has 103 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (182 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2005 Peugeot 607 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
| 2002 Daewoo Evanda | 2005 Peugeot 607 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Peugeot |
| Model | Evanda | 607 |
| Year Released | 2002 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1998 cc | 2946 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 131 HP | 204 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 182 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3750 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 87 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 82.6 mm |
| Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 240 km/hour |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 9.8 seconds | 8.4 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1422 kg | 1635 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4880 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1470 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.8 L/100km | 9.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 80 L |
