2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2009 Jeep Patriot

To start off, 2009 Jeep Patriot is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 1,998 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Evanda is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Jeep Patriot (156 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Jeep Patriot should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.

Because 2009 Jeep Patriot is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Jeep Patriot. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (182 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Jeep Patriot. (141 Nm @ 5000 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Jeep Patriot. 2009 Jeep Patriot has automatic transmission and 2002 Daewoo Evanda has manual transmission. 2002 Daewoo Evanda will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Jeep Patriot will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Daewoo Evanda 2009 Jeep Patriot
Make Daewoo Jeep
Model Evanda Patriot
Year Released 2002 2009
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1998 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 131 HP 156 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 6400 RPM
Torque 182 Nm 141 Nm
Torque RPM 4200 RPM 5000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 81 mm
Engine Stroke Size 86 mm 95.5 mm
Drive Type Front Rear
Transmission Type Manual Automatic
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 5 doors
Fuel Consumption 6.8 L/100km 8.7 L/100km
Fuel Consumption City 12.3 L/100km 10.2 L/100km


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]