2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2010 Renault Megane
To start off, 2010 Renault Megane is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. Both 2002 Daewoo Evanda and 2010 Renault Megane are equipped with a 1,998 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Renault Megane (227 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Renault Megane should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Renault Megane (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 128 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (182 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2010 Renault Megane will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 2010 Renault Megane | |
Make | Daewoo | Renault |
Model | Evanda | Megane |
Year Released | 2002 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 1998 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 227 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 182 Nm | 310 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 82.7 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 93 mm |
Top Speed | 199 km/hour | 236 km/hour |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4220 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 60 L |