2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2011 Audi R8
To start off, 2011 Audi R8 is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. At 4,200 cc (8 cylinders), 2011 Audi R8 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Audi R8 (420 HP @ 7800 RPM) has 289 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (131 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Evanda.
Because 2011 Audi R8 is all wheel drive (AWD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Audi R8 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2011 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 249 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2011 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Evanda. 2002 Daewoo Evanda has automatic transmission and 2011 Audi R8 has manual transmission. 2011 Audi R8 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Daewoo Evanda will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 2011 Audi R8 | |
Make | Daewoo | Audi |
Model | Evanda | R8 |
Year Released | 2002 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 1998 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 420 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 7800 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Front | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 7.5 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.6 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 90 L |