2002 Daewoo Evanda vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Evanda. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Evanda would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Evanda weights approximately 595 kg more than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Because 2013 Smart Fortwo is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2013 Smart Fortwo. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Evanda, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Evanda (181 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 89 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (92 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Evanda will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Evanda | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
Make | Daewoo | Smart |
Model | Evanda | Fortwo |
Year Released | 2002 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 131 HP | 0 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 5800 RPM |
Torque | 181 Nm | 92 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 86 mm | 72 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 86 mm | 81 mm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1435 kg | 840 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4780 mm | 2695 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1820 mm | 1559 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1450 mm | 1542 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2710 mm | 1867 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 7.5 L/100km | 4.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 13.6 L/100km | 5.8 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 65 L | 33 L |