2002 Daewoo Kalos vs. 1959 Isuzu Minx
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 43 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Isuzu Minx. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Isuzu Minx would be higher. At 1,489 cc (4 cylinders), 1959 Isuzu Minx is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Kalos (92 HP @ 6200 RPM) has 30 more horse power than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (62 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos should accelerate faster than 1959 Isuzu Minx. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Kalos weights approximately 15 kg more than 1959 Isuzu Minx. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1959 Isuzu Minx is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Isuzu Minx. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2002 Daewoo Kalos (130 Nm @ 3400 RPM) has 18 more torque (in Nm) than 1959 Isuzu Minx. (112 Nm @ 2400 RPM). This means 2002 Daewoo Kalos will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1959 Isuzu Minx. 2002 Daewoo Kalos has automatic transmission and 1959 Isuzu Minx has manual transmission. 1959 Isuzu Minx will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2002 Daewoo Kalos will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Kalos | 1959 Isuzu Minx | |
Make | Daewoo | Isuzu |
Model | Kalos | Minx |
Year Released | 2002 | 1959 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1399 cc | 1489 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 92 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 6200 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 112 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3400 RPM | 2400 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 77.9 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 73.4 mm | 75 mm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1045 kg | 1030 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 4120 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2440 mm |