2002 Daewoo Kalos vs. 1965 DAF Daffodil
To start off, 2002 Daewoo Kalos is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 DAF Daffodil. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 DAF Daffodil would be higher. At 1,148 cc (4 cylinders), 2002 Daewoo Kalos is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Daewoo Kalos (71 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 45 more horse power than 1965 DAF Daffodil. (26 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos should accelerate faster than 1965 DAF Daffodil. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Daewoo Kalos weights approximately 295 kg more than 1965 DAF Daffodil. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1965 DAF Daffodil is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1965 DAF Daffodil. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2002 Daewoo Kalos | 1965 DAF Daffodil | |
Make | Daewoo | DAF |
Model | Kalos | Daffodil |
Year Released | 2002 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1148 cc | 746 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 71 HP | 26 HP |
Engine RPM | 5400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 955 kg | 660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3890 mm | 3620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1680 mm | 1450 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2610 mm | 2060 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 33 L |