2002 Daewoo Kalos vs. 2006 Ford Mustang

To start off, 2006 Ford Mustang is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Daewoo Kalos. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Daewoo Kalos would be higher. At 4,604 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Ford Mustang (300 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 229 more horse power than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (71 HP @ 5400 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1901 kg more than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2006 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2006 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Daewoo Kalos, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2006 Ford Mustang (434 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 330 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Daewoo Kalos. (104 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2006 Ford Mustang will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Daewoo Kalos.

Compare all specifications:

2002 Daewoo Kalos 2006 Ford Mustang
Make Daewoo Ford
Model Kalos Mustang
Year Released 2002 2006
Body Type Hatchback Convertible
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1148 cc 4604 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 8 cylinders
Engine Type in-line V
Valves per Cylinder 2 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 71 HP 300 HP
Engine RPM 5400 RPM 5750 RPM
Torque 104 Nm 434 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 4500 RPM
Engine Compression Ratio 9.0:1 10.1:1
Drive Type Front Rear
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 2 doors
Vehicle Weight 955 kg 2856 kg
Vehicle Length 3890 mm 4770 mm
Vehicle Width 1680 mm 1890 mm
Vehicle Height 1500 mm 1390 mm
Wheelbase Size 2610 mm 2730 mm
Fuel Consumption 5.5 L/100km 9.4 L/100km
Fuel Consumption Overall 8.6 L/100km 11.8 L/100km
Fuel Tank Capacity 45 L 61 L


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]